(based on the analysis of questionnaires provided by 34 (of 50) participants upon competition of the Workshop.)
 

Item	Average Rating*
Subject matter	4.79
Scientific quality of the talks	4.50
Poster session	3.33
Discussion effectiveness	4.41
Discussion leaders	4.47
Discussion time	4.20
Relevance of topic to materials/interface science	4.66
Relevance of topic to microelectronics	4.52
Relative quality of this workshop to other NATO workshops you have attended	4.43
Social program	4.79
Conference hotel (room)	2.82
Meals	3.32

* on the "1, 2, 3, 4, 5" scale: 1 - poor, 2 - fair, 3 - good, 4 - very good, 5 - excellent.